GDPR Requirements Engineers Can Actually Implement
RuleMesh defines what to implement across your cloud infrastructure, how to execute it with framework-specific controls, and what evidence proves it was done — ready for engineers and AI agents.
Article 32(1)(a) — Security of Processing
Requirement: Implement pseudonymisation and encryption of personal data as appropriate measures to ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk.
SHALLimplement encryption_at_restANDencryption_in_transitINcloud_infrastructureUSINGprovider_KMSWITHkey_rotation
- AWS: KMS Key Management, S3 SSE, RDS Encryption
- Azure: Key Vault, Storage Service Encryption
- GCP: Cloud KMS, Cloud Storage Encryption
- encryption configuration export
- key rotation policy
- TLS certificate settings
The Engineering Protocol
From one MCP command to a shareable evidence signals report in minutes.
Connect your agent
One command adds RuleMesh to Claude Code, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible agent.
Scan your codebase
Your agent evaluates your repo against 192 GDPR IT requirements and records evidence.
Evidence Signals Report
A shareable report of what was found, what is partial, and what is missing.
Track in Jira
Turn findings into Jira tickets with verification checklists and evidence tracking.

Turn evidence signals into verified engineering work
What happens in Jira
Your agent scans your codebase locally and reports evidence signals — file names, confidence scores, checklist matches — directly into Jira tickets. Checklists update automatically. The risk matrix shows your current state across all bundles.
Why Jira
Engineers don't want another dashboard. RuleMesh injects requirements directly into the project management flow where work already happens.
Privacy by design
RuleMesh never accesses your source code. Scans run locally via your AI agent. Only evidence metadata — file names and signal scores — is reported.
192 GDPR requirements. 7 engineering modules.
We decomposed 99 GDPR articles into structured requirements mapped to cloud controls, security frameworks, and evidence checklists.
Controller Governance & Accountability
Art. 24-39: DPO, DPIA, processor agreements, records of processing
Access Control & Security Measures
Art. 5, 9, 28-32: encryption, pseudonymisation, personnel controls
Lawful Basis & Consent Engineering
Art. 6-8, 13: consent capture, legal basis, child protection
Data Subject Rights Operations
Art. 12-22: access, rectification, erasure, portability, objection
Breach & Change Notification
Art. 33-34: 72h notification, risk assessment, communication
International Transfer Governance
Art. 44-49: adequacy, SCCs, BCRs, derogations
Codes, Certifications & BCR
Art. 40-43, 47: codes of conduct, certification, binding rules
Mapped to 281 cloud security controls across AWS, Azure, GCP, and OWASP.
Agent-Agnostic Compliance: How Three AI Models Interpret Identical Regulatory Data via MCP
Our technical study explores the elimination of “Agent Drift” in regulatory mapping. By using structured MCP servers, we achieved consistent compliance coverage across Claude, Gemini, and GPT.
Ship compliant code with confidence
Join forward-thinking engineering teams using RuleMesh to ship compliant products faster.